Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David's avatar

Just some legal nitpicking in regards to the DUI. But before that, we apply the presumption of innocence in criminal matters in the US. Because he was never convicted, we presume Dak did not commit a DUI.

That said, he may still have committed a DUI even if his actual BAC was below the legal limit. DUI is about the impairment, not the BAC. If you’re driving impaired after having consumed alcohol, you have committed DUI. The BAC limit, then, is just an objective measure we use to assess impairment, and have fixed it that if you are above the defined limit, it’s sufficient evidence of impairment regardless of how else you may be presenting. Driving after drinking isn’t a good idea, even if you end up below the legal limit, but I agree it had a disproportionate effect on where he was drafted.

They chose to drop the charges, which suggests that, in addition to the presumption of innocence, they probably didn’t have good evidence of Dak actually being impaired while he was driving. He probably was just speeding and smelled of alcohol once pulled over. It doesn’t mean it was good judgment on his part, but it also suggests it’s not as serious as it was likely played up to be by the media.

Expand full comment
KENT FOWLER's avatar

Great deep dive and I agree with your conclusions as a lifelong Cowboys fan. One minor quibble - the years between Aikman and Romo were a wasteland. And isn’t it even more amazing that the Cowboys have had almost 20 years of Top 10-15 QB play this century from a UFA and a fourth rounder?

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts