Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David's avatar

Another great read! A couple of questions come up in my mind, reading this article and comparing it to some of the rest of your catalog.

What about Dak’s performances lead you to concluding that keeping him in instead of switching to Romo is the right move? I know your writing well enough that it’s clearly not the winning streak, per se.

You compared it briefly here to the McCown-Cutler situation—but of course, that comes with the big caveat that the respective established QB in DAL was much better than the established QB in CHI. Given that rookie quarterbacks are predictably bad (cf. Falcons-Cousins article) and Prescott was a rookie, how does his performance to that point overcome your prior that we should expect a regression towards poorer performance more in line with rookie quarterbacks? His pre-draft evaluation probably plays a role in that, along with some healthy skepticism about how well Romo would play coming back from a major injury, but I’d imagine there’s something in Dak’s play that leads you to conclude he’ll continue playing well (even if not necessarily forecasting “best rookie QB ever” well).

Relatedly, what kind of a sample size gives you confidence in that kind of prediction? How much shorter would Romo’s injury timeline have to have been to make it a legitimate question, at least from a performance standpoint?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts